Search for: "Carmichael Care, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2024, 5:11 pm
Jordan Inc (The “Jordan II”) [2004] UKHL 49 and found the carrier’s duty to properly stow and care for the cargo under Article 3(2) of the Hague Rules to be a delegable duty, as opposed to an inclination of the court in Australia, as shown in the New South Wales Court of Appeal decision in Nikolay Malakhov Shipping Co Ltd v SEAS Sapfor Ltd (1998) 44 NSWLR 371. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 10:01 pm
A few days ago, I posted my article on PAR Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:04 am
” A spokesperson for Eskaton, which is based in Carmichael, Calif., said that the allegations were unfounded, according to Patch.com “{We} maintain that this individual was provided the same highest level of care that each of the 3,500 people we serve each day receives,” said Stuart Greenbaum. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 2:25 pm
Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 150 (1999). [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 8:02 pm
Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 141-42 (1999). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:29 am
Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 147 (U.S. 1999); Daubert v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:27 pm
” In the majority of cases tried before a jury, the parties will desire to present the testimony of an expert in some field, such as injury or disease causation, standard of care or mental capacity. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm
Eventually, Judge Benner leaves it to Judge Carmichael to figure out a way to handle it. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
App. 1977); Carmichael v. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm
You can read about it here: Carmichael attorney known for suing under ADA sentenced for filing false tax returns. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am
The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 In 1986, Congress passed the Health Care Quality Improvement Act (“HCQIA”)[4], which was prompted by concerns that fear of litigation would deter hospitals, physicians and others from carrying out peer review of unprofessional conduct and from providing candid assessments to peer review bodies. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
The Paoli case thus represents the antithesis of a judicial approach that asks only the 10,000 foot level question whether the right methodology was used; Paoli calls for a close, careful analysis of the application of a proper methodology to every step in the case. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
Alcon Labs., Inc., 201 F. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 137 (1999) (discussing Daubert v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 151, 119 S. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
Brief in opposition of respondents Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. et al. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
By now Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A (1965) is so old as to be thought of as somewhat antediluvian. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 1:33 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 592 (1993). [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
In Karlo v. [read post]
